Infielder
5′7″
Tyler, TX
Chapel Hill/Louisiana
Sophomore
3:06
No. 14 Ags falls short in 1-0 pitchers' duel as Kentucky avoids the sweep
It was a scoreless ballgame until Kentucky's Karissa Hamilton mashed a one-run homer in the seventh, and with No. 14 Texas A&M unable to respond, the Aggies dropped Sunday's finale, 1-0, after claiming the series. A&M now sits at 10-5 in conference play with three series to play.
7:28
Griffin's fifth-inning blast lifts No. 14 A&M to 5-1 victory over Auburn
With the score tied 1-1 in the fifth, Kylei Griffin crushed a two-run home run OVER the left field scoreboard to help the 14th-ranked Aggies defeat Auburn on Friday, 5-1. In the circle, Emiley Kennedy earned another complete-game victory, punching out four Tigers in the process.
Breaking down A&M softball's offensive attack in Ford's second season
Between a number of key returners and a handful of talented transfers and incoming freshmen, Texas A&M softball's offense appears poised to take the next step in 2024. Ahead of Friday's season opener, we analyze which Aggie bats to keep an eye on this spring.
4/7/2024
No. 14 Ags falls short in 1-0 pitchers' duel as Kentucky avoids the sweep
×
TexAgs National Average Rating
The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an
industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes
publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services,
along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect,
which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.
The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of
how individual prospects rank nationally.
×
TexAgs Rating
The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger
and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and
evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas.
From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.
99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)
Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker
at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American
with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.
90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)
Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250
national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor
at the collegiate level with high professional potential.
80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)
Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect.
Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career.
Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.
70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)
Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential
contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development.
Professional potential is low.
