Rocag said:
No, I think he honestly believes these things.
I'm most entertained by the way he uses the word "data". Anything can be data. A monkey could fling poop at a wall and we could accurately call the shape it makes "data", but that doesn't mean it has relevance or significance for much of anything. And for the record, I believe remote viewing produces less useful data than said monkey flinging poop.
Keep on a gigglin....take it up with the director of Farsight Institute...Dr. Courtney Brown. Has a doctorate in statistics and if he calls it data.. I'll keep telling the truth as well.
Perhaps it simply doesn't have "relevance" for you? Noah's Ark being associated with extraterrestrials...makes perfect sense to me.
You have much to learn.
Which of the realities is more difficult to process, nhi or remote viewing?
Histories will be re-evaluated with the revelation and acceptance of new realities.
It's all about the green...let's SECede to the BIG10.