Ag_07 said:
I think his point was nothing she could say was going to change his mind and vice versa.
At that point it's a useless discussion.
Can't say I disagree
Perhaps. But imho- that's unproductive, and puts us in the position we're in now.
Even if no one changes their mind, People want to be heard. He should hear her, and then explain why he disagrees. That's what diffuses situations instead of escalating situations. It's how we learn new things and get different perspectives. If she still persists after you've heard her, than you end the conversation at that point.
Maybe that's what happened here, but it doesnt seem like he was allowing any discourse, which I'd argue, should be one of his top priorities as an elected official.