Texas A&M Football
Sponsored by

Thoughts from a Nebraska writer on the aftermath

2,406 Views | 21 Replies | Last: 13 yr ago by MSCAg
dalan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sorry, if this has already been posted but a good read..........................


The Big 12 Lives - But Still Has a Texas Problem
by Samuel McKewon
June 14, 2010

It’ll be Texas A&M athletic director Bill Byrne who inadvertently helped save the league. His refusal to play the “UT says” game - and his keen understanding of just how awry “Pac-16” travel schedules could get - was the lone stumbling block in the plan of Texas President Bill Powers, a California-Berkeley graduate - to send Dust Bowl football on the last train for the coast.

That stumbling block bought some key people - whom ESPN says you’ll never know- enough time to cobble together a weird, long-term TV deal - that, as of this hour, has remained oddly secret - that satisfied UT enough to make the Horns’ final demands to the Pac-10 utterly unreasonable.

Long story short: The TV, BCS and NCAA people weren’t ready for interstellar war and the Congressional snooping that was sure to come with it. They pulled Texas back from the brink, intervened on the behalf of the hapless Dan Beebe and saved a lot of butts.

And Nebraska slipped out of one hot mess of a league just in time.

It’s going to take years to truly unravel what happened over the last several months.

Because Rivals.com seems to have funneled its coverage through the reporter with the chattiest source, you’ve primarily heard UT’s side of the story. And what a side of beef it is! Somehow, while Texas flirted with three different conferences - the Pac-10, the Big Ten and SEC - while stringing along its Big 12, and it remained a steadfast savior, the Boss Horn.

Garbage. Until Monday, the Longhorns appeared willing to drag a coalition of the half-willing to the Pac-10. It would have been, over time, a disaster. To repeat: Texas was courting its own demise trucking itself to a league that has been, and will continue to be, irrelevant to the East Coast unless USC’s on the tube.

The “savior” will now get to own and control its Longhorn Sports Network while Iowa State, Kansas, Kansas State and Missouri lick cowboy boots. They’ll be thankful, of course - what choice do they have? - but they’ll be hired hands on UT‘s ranch.

A&M survived a slew of Texas threats but stood firm, using a threat of its own: The SEC. The Aggies’ surely intended to make the leap. Their intent staved off the Pac-10’s power play.

If you wanted to know what scares Texas, the Aggies unloaded the kryptonite. If Texas is Sentenza il brutto, the SEC is Tuco il cattivo. If the A&M gave the keys of Texas high school football to the SEC and its greasy palms, UT could no longer so easily usher in its preferred prospects on Junior Day and pressure them into committing. You don’t want a guy like Nick Saban sniffing around the DFW Metroplex and Houston, selling kids on the best football conference in the nation (which it still is).

But A&M’s bluff had a lot more bite than UT’s threat to disavow College Station. An encroachment from the east by the SEC, coupled with an inevitable partnership with the West, would have put Texas in a kind of checkmate. Far from consolidating its power from Gulf of Mexico to the Pacific Ocean, the two moves combined would have eroded what makes Texas…Texas.

Now, the Longhorns don’t turn in to the Roman Empire, don’t erode the traditional Pac-10 brand and maintain a Midwestern presence.

Minus Nebraska, of course.

The Big 12’s survival will cause some NU fans to glance back at a league that may dump its conference title game and create a round-robin scheduling format that would have allowed the Huskers to renew their Oklahoma rivalry.

Maybe they‘ll ask: If we could trade places with Missouri right this second - would we do it?

(And Mizzou says: Sure!)

But Nebraska should be thrilled with its choice.

The “Texas problem” is never going away. Not for the Big 12, not for Beebe - who will try to jump ship at the first sign of shore - and, perhaps worst of all, not for Texas, whose appetite is insatiable and antithetical, frankly, to good sense. The Horns’ reaction to the mere prospect of realignment was both childish and hypocritical, an impulse of jealousy and base greed. Think Jett Rink. Or Hud. The efficiency with which UT controlled and spun the story through the media is startling. Lone Star state politics is a cutthroat game in its own right.

And mark these words: Texas will test the open market again - with its Longhorns Sports Network firmly in place - and present itself to whichever conference is willing to bend its rules to fit UT under the umbrella.

Don’t forget this little nugget from the Denver Post, which quoted an exasperated Pac-10 negotiator: “At the 11th hour, after months of telling us they understand the TV rights, they're trying to pull a fast one on the verge of sealing the deal in the regents meeting. They want a better revenue sharing deal and their own network. Those were points of principle. (The Pac-10) wants to treat everyone fairly. It's been that way for months of discussions."

M-o-n-t-h-s of discussions. Texas can and will flirt. Long-term TV deal or not.

So Nebraska needs to walk away. No regrets.

And in a decade, you’ll see why. NU will be in a coffee shop talking research with its new friends. The Big 12 will be in another barroom brawl. Texas will be standing on a table, looking to dive into the scrum, a broken bottle in one hoof, a money clip in another.

Ozzy Osbourne
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good article. Nebraska has to feel good about getting away from this train wreck
The Cheap Seats
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nebraska has had sour grapes against Texas and the Big12 since day 1. They began to erode when partial qualifier rules changed when the league was formed.
claym711
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Good article
Velvet Jones
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I envy Nebraska.
Cannonball Craig III
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Great article. But I don't think the so called Big 12 really lives at all. A hollow shell.

It is just a jury rigged organization set up for the benefit of a few tv people and the further glorification of tu.

God, I hope this all falls apart soon. I have the feeling that if Tech has anything to say about it, it will.

Its painful to think about how much smarter and gutsy Nebraska is than we are.

[This message has been edited by Cannonball Craig III (edited 6/15/2010 8:50a).]
Hehateme1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
jt16
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
We were the only school that didn't have to follow tu's lead, and we chose to do it anyway. Baylor, tu, Tech, Missouri, Iowa State & Kansas St are all big winners. I'm embarrassed of our so called "leadership" at A&M. The big losers will be the College Statioin area on game day. Half empty stadiums to watch ISU don't generate local dollars.
The Collective
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Link?
Talon2DSO
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Can you put up a link, I'd love to share that!
Texarkana
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Skull Session
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nebraska got out with their lives. They are the lucky ones. The rest are being fitted for their leashes.


BTW, what exactly are we saving here? A conference that 7 of the 12 members were ready to jump to greener pastures, 2 of which did, just a few days ago?

And now this conference is the best thing since sliced bread? What hippy lettuce are you guys smoking out there?

[This message has been edited by Skull Session (edited 6/15/2010 9:00a).]
dalan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Here is the link: http://nebraska.statepaper.com/vnews/display.v/ART/2010/06/14/4c16f930c2b32
88jrt06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This article needs massive distribution.


Congrats to the only winner in this debacle:

Nebraska.
willtackleforfood
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
"And in a decade, you'll see why. NU will be in a coffee shop talking research with its new friends. The Big 12 will be in another barroom brawl. Texas will be standing on a table, looking to dive into the scrum, a broken bottle in one hoof, a money clip in another."

And here is your bottomline reason for making the move to the SEC. We're in bed with a snake. There will NEVER be stability in the Big 12 and t.u. will always stack the deck in their favor. The instability and distrust in the conference should have warranted the move. Not to mention a desire to be great - but that for sure is secondary at A&M.
Lucas Jackson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tom Osborne and Nebraska President have balls.


Bill Byrne and Loftin have no balls.
BigOil
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They were ready to jump ship only for more money, and the money appeared at the last minute.
wxguy95
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This tells me that tu is now stuck. They tainted the negotiations with the pac10 and NU will block them from the big10
brownbrick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Our best hope is that after taking in lots of money from this new tv deal for 1-4 years tu bolts again and we still end up in the SEC.

If that doesn't happen, this was a total waste in my opinion. Everyone knows this is a short term fix, hopefully the SEC gives us yet another chance when it goes to pieces for good.
maroonedntx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
....and tu will forever block us from the SEC.
TXAG89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What a disappointing outcome. I am not interested in Big 12-2 football.
floridAG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
@TXAG89

...and neither is the rest of the country.
MSCAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Really good article.


Big Red was the Big Winner after all of this.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.