***Russian - Ukraine War Tactical and Strategic Updates*** [Warning on OP]

6,988,220 Views | 46028 Replies | Last: 7 hrs ago by P.U.T.U
PJYoung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LMCane said:

I saw some of the footage of the motorcycle attacks - it was so bizarre

three motorcycles with 2 men on each- just trying to drive through deep underbrush near a tree line until they are all wacked and then set on fire.
Yeah in Russia you don't just die a usual bullet riddled death. It's that and then fire. Always fire.
mallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

Biden gives Ukraine permission to carry out limited strikes within Russia using US weapons


Quote:

President Joe Biden has given permission to Ukraine to strike inside Russian territory with American munitions, though he has restricted their use so Kyiv can only hit targets over the border close to Kharkiv after Russia made significant advances around the city in the northeastern part of the country close to the Russian border, two US officials told CNN.
Waffledynamics
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Reports of strikes on the Russian port of Kavkaz near Kerch, and an attempted strike on the port in Novorossiysk. Details to come. Apparently the attack may still be ongoing.

Really hope Ukraine brings down the Kerch Bridge. Would be great, doubly so if they can figure out a way to hamper the railways in the occupied South.

nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
'Worse than hell.'





Sitrep:
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
6 months later the Russians are still bogged down outside of Adviika?
JFABNRGR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Big losses for orc yesterday. 14 tanks not including MLTBs.

Andrew notes the ferries damaged as rail ferries. Would like to see more info on that.

https://www.reddit.com/r/UkraineWarVideoReport/comments/1d4t75n/a_high_number_of_abandoned_russian_armored/#lightbox
74OA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
"The Ukrainian General Staff released satellite imagery of what it says was a U.S.-supplied Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) strike on Russian ferries in Kerch. The ferries have been critical for transporting Russian troops and materiel heading to the front lines, especially during interruptions with traffic on the bridge." These are very large ferries, capable of loading entire freight trains, for example. Report includes other updates from the front.

Today's SITREP.
74OA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This is a big deal.

"The President recently directed his team to ensure that Ukraine is able to use U.S.-supplied weapons for counter-fire purposes in the Kharkiv region so Ukraine can hit back against Russian forces that are attacking them or preparing to attack them," a U.S. official told The War Zone. "Our policy with respect to prohibiting the use of ATACMS or long-range strikes inside of Russia has not changed."

"Russia is staging its forces across the border and firing from there, this includes launching airstrikes using glide bombs from Russian territory. This would presumably allow Ukraine to now fire on all these target types, taking away this safe haven for Russian forces."

This reads as the US giving Ukraine permission to use our weapons for short-range attacks into Russia in the Kharkiv region, but not long-range attacks as, for example, the UK and France have allowed. Regardless, the "Kharkiv region" can be liberally interpreted to include most of northeastern Ukraine and adjacent Russian territory. Since that region has been the focus of Russian offensive ops for some time now, this allows Ukraine to go after Russian troop assembly points and materiel depots before they move into Ukraine. We should take the gloves all the way off, but this policy adjustment is a step in the right direction.

WEAPONS
NATO
P.U.T.U
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Of course we are only seeing the topside but besides the hole on top of the deck it doesn't look like it destroyed the ships, just damaged. Even damaging them is a big win, just wish they had something else that could destroy the bigger ships that don't have their own munitions on them where you get secondary explosions.
74OA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
P.U.T.U said:

Of course we are only seeing the topside but besides the hole on top of the deck it doesn't look like it destroyed the ships, just damaged. Even damaging them is a big win, just wish they had something else that could destroy the bigger ships that don't have their own munitions on them where you get secondary explosions.
"The strike inflicted substantial damage on two ferries responsible for rail and vehicle transportation. One of the ferries ran aground, effectively blocking the entire Kerch crossing."

Another REPORT.
AgLA06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
P.U.T.U said:

Of course we are only seeing the topside but besides the hole on top of the deck it doesn't look like it destroyed the ships, just damaged. Even damaging them is a big win, just wish they had something else that could destroy the bigger ships that don't have their own munitions on them where you get secondary explosions.
It's possible it minor, but that sure looks like the warhead detonated down below after passing through the deck to me.
P.U.T.U
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
74OA said:

P.U.T.U said:

Of course we are only seeing the topside but besides the hole on top of the deck it doesn't look like it destroyed the ships, just damaged. Even damaging them is a big win, just wish they had something else that could destroy the bigger ships that don't have their own munitions on them where you get secondary explosions.
"The strike inflicted substantial damage on two ferries responsible for rail and vehicle transportation. One of the ferries ran aground, effectively blocking the entire Kerch crossing."

Another REPORT.
That is a win, now destroy the tugs that come get them
First Page Refresh
Page 1316 of 1316
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.