***Official 2023 - 2024 Dallas Mavericks Season Thread***

177,399 Views | 4065 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by PatAg
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Raptors are trying to get Jalen Johnson from the Hawks. Mavs, Pacers, Hawks, and Kings are the main teams going after Pascal.
shack009
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Well yeah I'd take a do it all wing on a nice rookie deal also. Atlanta should get a good haul for him.
M.C. Swag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


This guy is speculating because Green isn't trade eligible until 1/23, but the news is officially out there that the Mavs are feeling pressure to get a deal done for Siakam.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
shack009 said:

Well yeah I'd take a do it all wing on a nice rookie deal also. Atlanta should get a good haul for him.
Atlanta is in a tough spot that the Spurs control their unprotected first rounders for 25, 26, and 27, so they can't blow it up completely, but also I don't think they can build a real good team around Trae Young, since he is the worst defensive player in the league.

An Atlanta deal would have to include more than JJ, because of salaries. So it would likely be something like DeAndre Hunter, JJ, and Patty Mills for Garrett Temple and Pascal.


---------

The Pacers deals I have seen seem to be based around Matherin and Jarace Walker, but for salaries, Buddy H would need to be included, too.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Dallas Mavericks have indeed registered some exploratory trade interest in Siakam, league sources say, but one source over the weekend described their interest to me as overstated. The Mavericks are indeed hoping to upgrade at the four spot, I'm told, but my sense is Siakam is not atop their wish list.

via Marc Stein @ marcstein.substack.com


Stein said that Pascal is unlikely to sign an extension and wants to enter free agency to have more control.
zgolfz85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
We've already given up 20 to fontecchio
shack009
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Get Josh Green off this team.
zgolfz85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This team is infuriating
shack009
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ready for THJ to be gone. We might win 2 games a month because of him but we probably lose 5+ the same month because of him.
NoahAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
A friend just said Andrew Wiggins possibly to the Mavs.
zgolfz85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
NoahAg said:

A friend just said Andrew Wiggins possibly to the Mavs.


Barf?
M.C. Swag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I hope not unless there's compensation or they're willing to take Maxi and Holmes and nothing else
NoahAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
For Hardy, Holmes and a second.
HawthornAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Looking at Wiggins numbers this year, I don't see why the Mavs would want him. 12 points a game and barely shoots 30% from 3. What am I missing?
M.C. Swag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Salaries aren't even close
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hardy+Holmes+Seth Curry works financially.

But including this year, Wiggins has 4y109M left.

I don't see the Mavs taking on 109M guaranteed of Wiggins having the worst season of his career at 29 years old and 700+ NBA games played. Maybe you do that if they include Trace Jackson-Davis.


Here's a completely unrealistic trade that actually works financially. Puts the Mavs about 4M into the lux tax, for about 6.5M tax bill. Since Siakam says he won't sign an extension, I don't think he has any value. I also don't think Toronto takes that **** sandwich, but **** the raptors anyway.



So...

C: Lively/Koloko/Powell
PF: Siakam/TJD/OMax
SF: DJJ/Wiggins
SG: Kyrie/Green/Dex
PG: Luka/Exum

shack009
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hardy goes 19-9-9-1 tonight with no Luka.
mavsfan4ever
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's maddening that Hardy hasn't been getting playing time, especially when Kyrie has been out. He was great last year and this year should be a year where we play him in order for him to keep his progression going. But our coaches just refuse to develop young talent.
awinlonghorn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
is it too early to trade grant?

Both grant and josh win the tony snow award. 0,0,0 in 25 mins. absolutely infuriating.
HawthornAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
awinlonghorn said:

is it too early to trade grant?

Both grant and josh win the tony snow award. 0,0,0 in 25 mins. absolutely infuriating.


Josh Green had 14 points, 5 rebounds, and 5 assists in 25 minutes last night on 7 of 8 shooting.
zgolfz85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That kyrie stat line today
mavsfan4ever
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That was our best win of the year and we did it without lively. We can beat anyone when Kyrie is playing. Need him to stay healthy.
M.C. Swag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
100%. The Mavs are built to beat a team like the Wolves when they're healthy. The Mavs have 2 elite shotmakers that are more than comfortable taking mid range shots. We've played the Wolves 3x this season and in none of them have the Mavs had their full starting lineup. I'm fascinated to see what a rematch with Lively would look like.

Also...Derrick Jones Jr is so good.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
M.C. Swag said:

100%. The Mavs are built to beat a team like the Wolves when they're healthy. The Mavs have 2 elite shotmakers that are more than comfortable taking mid range shots. We've played the Wolves 3x this season and in none of them have the Mavs had their full starting lineup. I'm fascinated to see what a rematch with Lively would look like.

Also...Derrick Jones Jr is so good.
Looking forward to Kyrie making Gobert switch out on him and then abusing the F out of him.

Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Listened to the Hollinger/Duncan podcast on trade deadline and they thought the Mavs would/should go get Jeremi Grant.
shack009
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Guitarsoup said:

Listened to the Hollinger/Duncan podcast on trade deadline and they thought the Mavs would/should go get Jeremi Grant.
I'd be fine with Denver-era Jerami Grant, but he doesn't want to be that guy anymore. We are talking about a guy who purposefully went to Detroit so he could have the ball all the time, and he shot like 38% from the field. He's just so inefficient.

If he is down to come play off the ball, make catch and shoot 3s, cut to the basket, and guard one of the other team's best players, then sure.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
shack009 said:

Guitarsoup said:

Listened to the Hollinger/Duncan podcast on trade deadline and they thought the Mavs would/should go get Jeremi Grant.
I'd be fine with Denver-era Jerami Grant, but he doesn't want to be that guy anymore. We are talking about a guy who purposefully went to Detroit so he could have the ball all the time, and he shot like 38% from the field. He's just so inefficient.

If he is down to come play off the ball, make catch and shoot 3s, cut to the basket, and guard one of the other team's best players, then sure.
He's shooting 46%/42%/80% on a ****ty team that doesn't have a real starting-level PG. Brogdon is more of a 6th man scoring guard, Scoot isnt ready and Simons is a 2. I think he would fit well in Dallas and would be a great PnR partner for Luka/Kyrie.
jeffdjohnson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
To move into low key title contention they might not need an all star player. Maybe get a backup 5 for starters. The Nuggets got really lucky when they pulled Aaron Gordon for a single 1st round pick. He's an athletic defender and rebounder at the 4 with some scoring upside. That's what the Mavs need. Considering the cost, I just don't think the Mavs should be spending valuable assets chasing Jerami Grant if he isn't the defender & rebounder that they need. That is more important that the scoring aspect. Also, no reason for Portland to give him away cheap at this point in their rebuild.

I'm not sure there is really any perfect fit out there unfortunately. Teams that might be looking to sell CHA (PJ Washington), CHI (Patrick Williams if they don't want to extend him), WAS (Kuzma), UTA (Collins), BKN (Finney-Smith). They are all decent defenders with some upside on mid to bad teams. It's hard to see any of those players moving the needle though, but the Mavs still might want to take a shot on one of them. At the end of the day, if this team is healthy and Luka / Kyrie are playing at this high level then they will have a shot in the playoffs.
M.C. Swag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Agree and I think PJ Washington is a guy the Mavs could/should target in the off season. Once the Knicks pick conveys, dallas will have up to 3 FRPs to trade and while I don't think Washington is worth THAT, he'd be at least gettable.
zgolfz85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
How are we getting destroyed by a ja-less grizz team at home…especially after Sunday's game? This team so so roller coaster
shack009
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
THJ is -23
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Kings offer to Toronto for Pascal is Harrison Barnes, Heuter, Davion Mitchell and a first.
M.C. Swag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ya i'd turn that down too. Gotta have Keegan if your toronto.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
M.C. Swag said:

Ya i'd turn that down too. Gotta have Keegan if your toronto.


But since Pascal won't sign an extension, you cant move Keegan for 3 months of Pascal. Non starter
mavsfan4ever
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yea, it seems like the raptors are severely overrating the value of a Siakam rental.
First Page Last Page
Page 19 of 117
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.