Get the Vax

51,258 Views | 659 Replies | Last: 13 days ago by Sapper Redux
schmendeler
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Infants aren't approved to receive the covid vaccine
one MEEN Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
schmendeler said:

Infants aren't approved to receive the covid vaccine


Yet. Aren't approved, yet. Don't you worry, the same companies that are trying to push the vaccine on 5 year olds even as other countries stop at 18 because of heart issues will one day push it onto even younger kids.
Sapper Redux
How long do you want to ignore this user?
one MEEN Ag said:

schmendeler said:

Infants aren't approved to receive the covid vaccine


Yet. Aren't approved, yet. Don't you worry, the same companies that are trying to push the vaccine on 5 year olds even as other countries stop at 18 because of heart issues will one day push it onto even younger kids.


It never ceases to amaze me that 900,000 dead is no big deal, but a vaccine is the end of the world for some people.
one MEEN Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sapper Redux said:

one MEEN Ag said:

schmendeler said:

Infants aren't approved to receive the covid vaccine


Yet. Aren't approved, yet. Don't you worry, the same companies that are trying to push the vaccine on 5 year olds even as other countries stop at 18 because of heart issues will one day push it onto even younger kids.


It never ceases to amaze me that 900,000 dead is no big deal, but a vaccine is the end of the world for some people.
A) That number is inflated as it includes those who died with COVID not of COVID, and the people who counted the dead are the hospitals getting paid for COVID deaths.
B) The supermajority of those who died were well over the age of 70 and had 3+ comorbidities. COVID was what pushed them across the goal line. People freaked out like this was the Spanish Flu that killed the young just as well as the old. Poland didn't have a huge wave of deaths among the elderly during COVID like near peer countries did. You want to know why? Because three brutal flu seasons killed all of the 'Most Likely To Die of COVID' contenders before COVID could. That should tell you a whole lot about who it kills and doesn't.
C) Swine Flu killed is estimated to have killed 600,000 people and nary a word was said about it after Obama demanded the CDC to stop tracking it (and got them to with much more than a week of bad press from the media).

You want to talk about deaths? In America, across the same timeframe, nearly 7 million people have died. As we're on a clip of about 2.8 a year, pushing 2.5 years now. #1 killer: 690,000 a year from heart disease, another 600k from all types of cancer. 250,000 a year from COVID-19.

Where are the burger lockdowns? The sunscreen mandates?

You know what did the most damage through all of this? Technology. Rapid testing gave governments the ability to know more than they ever did, so they leaned on it so hard, made so many bzyantine rules, and we all lost. A new vaccine for a virus type that for decades has evaded vaccines because of its mutation propensity makes it laugh at normal vaccines. Research groups that went around their own laws and guidelines and did gain of function research. Social media hysteria and 24/7 news cycles, and a weak understanding of basic statistics that allowed people to be blinded with bull**** COVID stats.

COVID literally couldn't have happened 30 years ago, because of gain of function research limits, but if it did it would have been over and done, and america would have trucked on just fine.



schmendeler
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
"A) That number is inflated as it includes those who died with COVID not of COVID, and the people who counted the dead are the hospitals getting paid for COVID deaths."

This talking point is gutted when you look at excess deaths since 2020. Something came on the scene and killed a **** ton more people than statistically normal.

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/excess_deaths.htm
one MEEN Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
schmendeler said:

"A) That number is inflated as it includes those who died with COVID not of COVID, and the people who counted the dead are the hospitals getting paid for COVID deaths."

This talking point is gutted when you look at excess deaths since 2020. Something came on the scene and killed a **** ton more people than statistically normal.

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/excess_deaths.htm

Oh were now allowed to use top level excess deaths here? And you're claiming all of those are straight up COVID deaths. No suicides or drug overdose due to lockdowns or vaccines reactions. Great. And would this be a good time when we bring up the age related breakout graphs that show a way way way above standard deviations of younger people dying that only appears after the vaccine comes out? A German healthcare exec said it would be equivalent to a 1-400 year random event for this many young people to die.


Macarthur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
schmendeler said:

"A) That number is inflated as it includes those who died with COVID not of COVID, and the people who counted the dead are the hospitals getting paid for COVID deaths."

This talking point is gutted when you look at excess deaths since 2020. Something came on the scene and killed a **** ton more people than statistically normal.

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/excess_deaths.htm


Yes.

If you will do a simple google search for covid deaths undercounted, there is an endless list of articles.

I believe as more time goes by, we are going to see how severely deaths have been undercounted.
schmendeler
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://www.bbc.com/news/health-60835856.amp

"No evidence Covid vaccines lead to young deaths - ONS"
ramblin_ag02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Thanks for the random call out. As anyone can tell you, I'm clearly someone who blindly follows authority without any good reason or skepticism. Just read my posting history or ask anyone that knows me. I'm always just parroting some talking point or another without giving anything any thought or analysis. So you sure got me pegged
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Sb1540
How long do you want to ignore this user?
These are the kind of low IQ situations that manifest from mandates. You know it's really bad when far left figures like Trevor Noah speak out against mandates as well. Reminds me of the movie Idiocracy.





"Why come you don't have a mask?!"
Jim Hogg is angry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Star Wars Memes Only said:




Macarthur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm not sure what you're getting at here.

It specifically states there is no mandate, yet you're slamming mandates and using indiocracy to emphasize your point?

I'm really baffled by why some people wearing masks bothers some people so much.
Catag94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
And millions of "vaccinated" infected.
Jim Hogg is angry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Klaus Schwab
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doinked Field Goal said:


Makes you wonder if most people who copied line for line propaganda noticed when the same propaganda machine said the opposite. Typically happens that way or they just adopt old faithful "well we didn't know and then we got stats so now we know and you're still a POS" The religion of moving the goal posts. Hard to love your enemies but necessary.
Jim Hogg is angry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://www.jci.org/articles/view/170682
ChemEAg08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Doinked Field Goal said:



And
https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/partner_surveys/jan_2022/covid_19_democratic_voters_support_harsh_measures_against_unvaccinated?s=09

And never forget that 55% of democrats want to fine you if you didn't get the jab.

And 59% wanted to force you to stay confined in your home if you didn't get it.

And 48% wanted to be able to arrest you if you questioned its efficacy.

And 45% wanted to send you to internment camps if you didn't get it.

And 47% want the government to track your movements if you didn't get the shot.

And 29% wanted to remove your children from you if you didn't get it.
kurt vonnegut
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Jim Hogg is angry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medical/health-shocker-jamie-foxx-left-paralyzed-and-blind-from-blood-clot-in-his-brain-after-receiving-covid-19-vaccine-source-claims/ar-AA1bZrwx
BluHorseShu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Doinked Field Goal said:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medical/health-shocker-jamie-foxx-left-paralyzed-and-blind-from-blood-clot-in-his-brain-after-receiving-covid-19-vaccine-source-claims/ar-AA1bZrwx
Still all speculation. No one has confirmed this. Tabloid conjecture until otherwise.
Jim Hogg is angry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/coronavirus-covid-19-update-fda-holds-advisory-committee-meeting-discuss-authorization-covid-19
RAB91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yeah, that video in the first post didn't age too well.
Jim Hogg is angry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/07/tragic-news-actress-succumbs-assisted-suicide-following-covid/
dermdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What is fascinating is that the "party of science" does not accept actual scientific data.

And refuse to admit they were wrong.

Blue koolaid.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Sapper Redux
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dermdoc said:

What is fascinating is that the "party of science" does not accept actual scientific data.

And refuse to admit they were wrong.

Blue koolaid.


Which scientific data are you specifically referring to?
dermdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sapper Redux said:

dermdoc said:

What is fascinating is that the "party of science" does not accept actual scientific data.

And refuse to admit they were wrong.

Blue koolaid.


Which scientific data are you specifically referring to?
The first 2 jabs and maybe one booster helped with severity of disease and mortality rates in elderly and endangered populations.

The vax did not prevent spread of the virus which is the main point of a vaccine. We were lied to.

And when it all said and done, I think stats will show more unexpected sudden deaths in healthy young people who got the vax.

Anybody who gets the boosters now is nuts.

But unlike libs, I am not about forcing Americans to do anything they do not want to do. I will give what I think is good medical advice to my patients.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
dermdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://abcnews.go.com/Health/breakthrough-covid-cases-commonplace-experts-set-expectations-vaccine/story?id=85570454

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2207270

Friend of mine lost a 20 y/o son to myocarditis after getting the vax.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
dermdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://www.bmj.com/content/376/bmj.o298

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8554481/
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
dermdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.06.09.23290893v1
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Sapper Redux
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dermdoc said:

https://abcnews.go.com/Health/breakthrough-covid-cases-commonplace-experts-set-expectations-vaccine/story?id=85570454

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2207270

Friend of mine lost a 20 y/o son to myocarditis after getting the vax.


You realize myocarditis rates are much higher with a Covid infection, right? And that myocarditis rates from the vaccine are in line with other vaccines?

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551713622000642?via%3Dihub

Quote:

Overall, the rates of myocarditis following SARS-CoV-2 infection are much higher than after vaccination.17 Data from the largest integrated health care organization in Israel indicate that SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with an excess risk of myocarditis when compared with age- and risk-matched controls (risk ratio 18.3 and risk difference 11.0 events per 100,000 persons) that is much higher than the excess risk of myocarditis following administration of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine (risk ratio 3.2 and risk difference 2.7 events per 100,000 persons).
Zobel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So COVID vaccines cause ALS now?
ramblin_ag02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
dermdoc said:

Sapper Redux said:

dermdoc said:

What is fascinating is that the "party of science" does not accept actual scientific data.

And refuse to admit they were wrong.

Blue koolaid.


Which scientific data are you specifically referring to?
The first 2 jabs and maybe one booster helped with severity of disease and mortality rates in elderly and endangered populations.

The vax did not prevent spread of the virus which is the main point of a vaccine. We were lied to.

And when it all said and done, I think stats will show more unexpected sudden deaths in healthy young people who got the vax.

Anybody who gets the boosters now is nuts.

But unlike libs, I am not about forcing Americans to do anything they do not want to do. I will give what I think is good medical advice to my patients.


Your first point is accurate but not precise. The vaccines were fantastic >99% at preventing disease and spread of the alpha strain. It was still >80% for delta. We saw no community spread in places with high vaccine rate until the omicron strain. So from Feb 2021 to Dec 2021 the vaccines were fantastic.

From omicron onward, the vaccines are only helpful for reducing severity. Between genetic drift and widespread immunity, COVID is basically at flu level right now. I haven't admitted anyone for COVID since last November. I'm only recommending vaccines for the sick and elderly now, and even then only newly updated vaccines. The next will probably come out in the fall
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
dermdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ramblin_ag02 said:

dermdoc said:

Sapper Redux said:

dermdoc said:

What is fascinating is that the "party of science" does not accept actual scientific data.

And refuse to admit they were wrong.

Blue koolaid.


Which scientific data are you specifically referring to?
The first 2 jabs and maybe one booster helped with severity of disease and mortality rates in elderly and endangered populations.

The vax did not prevent spread of the virus which is the main point of a vaccine. We were lied to.

And when it all said and done, I think stats will show more unexpected sudden deaths in healthy young people who got the vax.

Anybody who gets the boosters now is nuts.

But unlike libs, I am not about forcing Americans to do anything they do not want to do. I will give what I think is good medical advice to my patients.


Your first point is accurate but not precise. The vaccines were fantastic >99% at preventing disease and spread of the alpha strain. It was still >80% for delta. We saw no community spread in places with high vaccine rate until the omicron strain. So from Feb 2021 to Dec 2021 the vaccines were fantastic.

From omicron onward, the vaccines are only helpful for reducing severity. Between genetic drift and widespread immunity, COVID is basically at flu level right now. I haven't admitted anyone for COVID since last November. I'm only recommending vaccines for the sick and elderly now, and even then only newly updated vaccines. The next will probably come out in the fall


Thank you my friend.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
ramblin_ag02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm just glad it's over. I can't even say with confidence that I'll recommend anything by the time Fall comes around. I've had elderly patients with terrible lungs get COVID in the past month and they've all been just fine
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
dermdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sapper Redux said:

dermdoc said:

https://abcnews.go.com/Health/breakthrough-covid-cases-commonplace-experts-set-expectations-vaccine/story?id=85570454

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2207270

Friend of mine lost a 20 y/o son to myocarditis after getting the vax.


You realize myocarditis rates are much higher with a Covid infection, right? And that myocarditis rates from the vaccine are in line with other vaccines?

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551713622000642?via%3Dihub

Quote:

Overall, the rates of myocarditis following SARS-CoV-2 infection are much higher than after vaccination.17 Data from the largest integrated health care organization in Israel indicate that SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with an excess risk of myocarditis when compared with age- and risk-matched controls (risk ratio 18.3 and risk difference 11.0 events per 100,000 persons) that is much higher than the excess risk of myocarditis following administration of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine (risk ratio 3.2 and risk difference 2.7 events per 100,000 persons).

But you may or may not get Covid. Once you get the vax, you are guaranteed having a higher rate of myocarditis if you are a young male.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.